Sup fam. Got some quick but tasty nuggets for you today.
First off I've come up with a way of figuring a weapons bulk that gets good results. This is NOT official by any means but it seems to work. It is a bit fiddly though.First you're gonna have to fi
gure to values:
Bul and Buw.
Bul is based on the weapons length in millimeters and can be figured as:
6 × LOG₁₀(Wl/305) + 2
Wl is the weapons length is millimeters.
Buw is based on the weapons weight (unloaded if mounted) in pounds and can be figured as:
2 × LOG₁₀(Ww) + 2
Ww is based on the weapons weight (unloaded if mounted) in pounds.
The weapons actual Bulk then can be figured by taking the average of Bul and Buw and then slapping a negative signto it.
For example: A FAMAS G2 is 757mm long and weighs 8.4lbs. This gives us a Bul of 6 × LOG₁₀(757/305) + 2 or 4.4 and a Buw of 2 × LOG₁₀(8.4) + 2or 3.8. This gives a Bulk of (4.4 + 3.8)/2 or -4. While there are no stats for a FAMAS in any official book, HANS was kind enough to provide the forum with a write up and sure enough it's bulk is -4.
And while we're here, might as well throw in a quick way to estimate a magazine length, just so you can get an idea if your magazine modification is practical (and should let you know you're not going to see a huge increase in the number of caseless rounds a standard magazine can hold).
Magazine height can be estimated as number of rounds × rounds actual diameter (this might differ from the listed one, a 5.56 NATO round is actually ~5.7mm) × the polymer/plastic magazine type weight modifier for a given magazine type found on High-Tech p.155 under Extended Magazines. Multiply this value 0.7 for curved magazines like most military rifles use.Adjust the height by +/-10% as needed.
Why am I getting some casting couch energy form this pic? |
For Example: a 20 round magazine for a FN Five SeveN is about 126mm (~5 in.) tall. The actual diameter for the round is 5.7mm and used a high-density magazine which has a polymer/plastic weight modifier of 1.1. This gives us a height of 20 × 5.7 × 1.1 or 125.4mm (4.9 in.). Close enough for government work.
So why am I thinking of gun stats all of a sudden? Well, I know, bad question. When am I NOT thinking of gun stats after all. Well I may or may not be working on expanding the kinetic side of Ultra-Tech firepower in my next few posts. I do hope to get some stuff out soon but I am also working on some non blog related projects so maybe that might be more on the soonish side of things but they'll get there.
Oh my, this is some good stuff!
ReplyDeleteHoly molly that was quick heh.
DeleteBut thank ya. So, quick question to test the waters. Which would you want more? A TL 9 totally not knock off of Cheytac's M200 or some TL 10 gauss action?
I'm fond of Gauss weapons, so my vote goes to them.
DeleteSounds good to me. Gauss it is.
DeleteYour approach to calculating weapon bulk and magazine dimensions is a thoughtful blend of mathematical precision and practical application. It's great to see this level of detail to enhance realism and functionality in game mechanics. Looking forward to your future posts on Ultra-Tech firepower!
ReplyDeleteUsed Guns Australia